A brief overview of Buddhist philosophy
a term paper for Indian Philosophy
by Delia Morgan
The story of Buddhism might be said to have
begun with a loss of innocence. Siddhartha Gautama, a young prince of the Shakhya
clan in India, had been raised in a life of royal ease, shielded from the misery
and cruelties of the world outside the palace gates, distracted by sensual pleasures
and luxurious living. But one day the fateful encounter with the real world occurred,
and Siddhartha was shaken to the core. There in his own kingdom, not far from
his gardens and delights, he encountered people suffering from sickness, old age
and death; he brooded over these things, deeply disturbed that such was the fate
of all beings. Then he encountered an ascetic holy man, a renunciate dedicated
to liberation. The prince then undertook the great renunciation, forsaking his
family, fortune and kingdom in pursuit of the path of liberation. The central,
profound question that burned in Gautama was this: "How may suffering be
ended?" (Eliade, p. 471-475; 'Mahapadana suttanta')
He became a wandering
ascetic, practiced yogic disciplines and meditation, studied with various teachers,
and attained high states of consciousness; but still he did not find the answer
to his question. He practiced severe forms of asceticism, almost to the point
of death by starvation, all without gain. Finally he sat under a bodhi tree, determined
not to rise from meditation until he had gained the insight he sought. Not long
after, he attained enlightenment; he became the Buddha -- the Awakened One. He
had ascended through various stages of meditative awareness, he had seen all of
his past lives, and he had seen directly into reality, into the nature of existence
and the causes of suffering and rebirth. He pondered whether to try to teach these
insights, so subtle and difficult to grasp to others; perhaps it would be futile.
But finally he decided that at least some of the people would be able to understand;
perhaps more importantly, they could be shown the path to arrive at these insights
themselves. He gave his first sermon to a few disciples in the Deer park at Benares,
and then continued to wander and teach for the next forty-five years, until his
death at the age of eighty.
He was born in the 6th century BCE, a time
of great turmoil and political change in India; many were unsatisfied with the
Vedic religion, and new teachings had emerged, among them the Upanishads. The
Buddha stood largely outside the Vedic tradition, criticizing many of its central
teachings. Nevertheless, he had been influenced by that tradition and his teachings
in turn would have a profound effect on later teachers in the Hindu tradition,
such as Shankara; even in such Hindu classics as the Bhagavad Gita, some reaction
can be seen to Buddhist teachings. But later centuries would see the Buddha's
influence wane in India and instead spread to other Asian countries. Today Buddhism
has spread throughout the world. Various sects have arisen as later teachers have
reinterpreted and expounded upon the Buddha's basic teachings. Buddhism may be
considered a religion, a philosophy, a way of life, or all three; here we will
deal mainly with Buddhism as a philosophical system.
II. Buddhist metaphysics
The Buddha's main concern was to eliminate suffering, to find a cure for the
pain of human existence. In this respect he has been compared to a physician,
and his teaching has been compared to a medical or psychological prescription.
Like a physician, he observed the symptoms -- the disease that human kind was
suffering from; next he gave a diagnosis -- the cause of the disease; then he
gave the prognosis -- it could be cured; finally he gave the prescription -- the
method by which the condition could be cured.
His first teaching, the
Four Noble Truths, follows this pattern. First, the insight that "life is
dukkha." Dukkha is variously translated as suffering, pain, impermanence;
it is the unsatisfactory quality of life which is targeted here -- life is often
beset with sorrow and trouble, and even at its best, is never completely fulfilling.
We always want more happiness, less pain. But this 'wanting more' is itself the
problem: the second noble truth teaches that the pain of life is caused by 'tanha'
-- our cravings, our attachments, our selfish grasping after pleasure and avoiding
pain. Is there something else possible? The third noble truth says yes; a complete
release from attachment and dukkha is possible, a liberation from pain and rebirth.
The fourth noble truth tells how to attain this liberation; it describes the Noble
Eightfold Path leading to Nirvana, the utter extinction of the pain of existence.
(The eightfold path is described in a later section.)
Another main teaching
of Buddhist metaphysics is known as the Three Marks of Existence. The first is
Anicca, impermanence: all things are transitory, nothing lasts. The second is
Anatta, No-Self or No-Soul: human beings, and all of existence, is without a soul
or self. There is no eternal, unchanging part of us, like the Hindu idea of Atman;
there is no eternal, unchanging aspect of the universe, like the Hindu idea of
Brahman. The entire idea of self is seen as an illusion, one which causes immeasurable
suffering; this false idea gives rise to the consequent tendency to try to protect
the self or ego and to preserve its interests, which is futile since nothing is
permanent anyway. The third mark of existence is that of Dukkha, suffering: all
of existence, not just human existence but even the highest states of meditation,
are forms of suffering, ultimately inadequate and unsatisfactory.
three marks of existence can be seen as the basis for the four noble truths above;
in turn the three marks of existence may be seen to come out of an even more fundamental
Buddhist theory, that of Pratityasamutpada: Dependent Origination, or Interdependent
Co-arising. This theory says that all things are cause and are caused by other
things; all of existence is conditioned, nothing exists independently, and there
is no First Cause. There was no beginning to the chain of causality; it is useless
to speculate how phenomenal existence started. However, it can be ended, and that
is the ultimate goal of Buddhism -- the ultimate liberation of all creatures from
the pain of existence.
Sometimes this causality is spoken of as a circular
linking of twelve different factors; if the chain of causality can be broken,
existence is ended and liberation attained. One of these factors is attachment
or craving, tanha, and another is ignorance; these two are emphasized as being
the weak links in the chain, the place to make a break. To overcome selfish craving,
one cultivates the heart through compassion; to eliminate ignorance one cultivates
the mind through wisdom. Compassion and wisdom are twin virtues in Buddhism, and
are cultured by ethical behavior and meditation, respectively. It is a process
of self-discipline and self-development which emphasizes the heart and mind equally,
and insists that both working together are necessary for enlightenment.
Buddhism can be seen as a process of personal development, one may well ask: what
is a person, if not a soul or self? In keeping with the ideas of dependent origination,
Buddhism views a person as a changing configuration of five factors, or 'skandhas.'
First there is the world of physical form; the body and all material objects,
including the sense organs. Second there is the factor of sensation or feeling;
here are found the five senses as well as mind, which in Buddhism is considered
a sense organ. The mind senses thoughts and ideas much the same as the eye senses
light or the ear senses air pressure. Thirdly, there is the factor of perception;
here is the faculty which recognizes physical and mental objects. Fourth there
is the factor variously called impulses or mental formulations; here is volition
and attention, the faculty of will, the force of habits. Lastly, there is the
faculty of consciousness or awareness. In Buddhism consciousness is not something
apart from the other factors, but rather interacting with them and dependent on
them for its existence; there is no arising of consciousness without conditions.
(Rahula, p. 24) Here we see no idea of personhood as constancy, but rather a fleeting,
changing assortment or process of various interacting factors. A major aim of
Buddhism is first to become aware of this process, and then to eliminate it by
eradicating its causes.
This process does not terminate with the dissolution
of the physical body upon death; Buddhism assumes reincarnation. Even though there
is no soul to continue after death, the five skandhas are seen as continuing on,
powered by past karma, and resulting in rebirth. Karma in Buddhism, as in Hinduism,
stems from volitional action and results in good or bad effects in this or a future
life. Buddhism explains the karmic mechanism a bit differently; it is not the
results of the action per se that result in karma, but rather the state of mind
of the person performing the action. Here again, Buddhism tends to focus on psychological
insights; the problem with bad or selfish action is that it molds our personality,
creates ruts or habitual patterns of thinking and feeling. These patterns in turn
result in the effects of karma in our lives.
Many other metaphysical
questions were put to the Buddha during his life; he did not answer them all.
He eschewed the more abstract and speculative metaphysical pondering, and discouraged
such questions as hindrances on the path. Such questions as what is Nirvana like,
what preceded existence, etc., were often met by silence or what may have seemed
like mysterious obscurity. Asked what happens to an Arhant , an enlightened one,
upon his death, the Buddha was said to have replied: "What happens to the
footprints of the birds in the air." Nirvana means 'extinction' and he likened
the death of an arhant to the extinction of a flame when the fuel (karma) runs
out. He evidently felt that many such questions were arising out of a false attachment
to self, and that they distracted one from the main business of eliminating suffering.
III. The Path to Liberation: the Buddhist Way of Life
intended his philosophy to be a practical one, aimed at the happiness of all creatures.
While he outlined his metaphysics, he did not expect anyone to accept this on
faith but rather to verify the insights for themselves; his emphasis was always
on seeing clearly and understanding. To achieve this, however, requires a disciplined
life and a clear commitment to liberation; the Buddha laid out a clear path to
the goal and also observations on how to live life wisely. The core of this teaching
is contained in the Noble Eightfold Path, which covers the three essential areas
of Buddhist practice: ethical conduct, mental discipline ('concentration; or 'meditation'),
and wisdom. The goals are to cultivate both wisdom and compassion; then these
qualities together will enable one ultimately to attain enlightenment. The path
is laid out in eight steps, but one may practice all of the steps simultaneously,
since they work together.
The first two steps or factors constitute Wisdom.
Right understanding (or right views) is the grasping of true reality, as seen
in the Buddhist teachings; it is not merely an intellectual understanding, although
this helps. Rather it is a direct insight and penetration into the nature of things.
Right thought (or right intentions) is that frame of mind which is selfless, detached
and free of malice; that generosity of spirit which extends loving benevolence
to all beings.
The next three steps on the eightfold path constitute
ethical conduct. Right speech involves abstaining from lies, from rude or malicious
language, from foolish gossip, and from slander or backbiting that may cause disharmony.
One should speak a gentle, kind, and useful truth, or not speak at all. Right
action requires abstaining from killing and all violence, stealing, dishonest
practices, intoxicating drinks and improper sexual behavior. Right livelihood
means that one should abstain from any profession that brings harm to others,
such as weaponry, butchering animals or selling liquor. Also one's career should
develop one's talents, overcome the ego by joining in a common cause, and provide
what is needed for a worthwhile existence -- basic comforts and necessities, but
not ostentatious luxuries.
The last three steps on the path are those
which promote mental discipline. Right effort is the will to cultivate wholesome
states of mind and eliminate evil or unwanted ones. Right mindfulness (or attentiveness)
involves being keenly aware of the processes involved in one's daily existence,
those of the body, the sensations, the mind and the experiencing of thoughts and
ideas. Mindfulness is practiced in Buddhist forms of meditation such as vipassana,
through techniques like observation of the breath and bodily sensations. Right
concentration refers to the progressive stages of dhyana (this is closer to what
is called meditation in most Hindu traditions). In this discipline, the mind is
gradually cleared of passionate desires, then thoughts, then finally even feelings
of joy, until only pure awareness remains, in a state of perfect calm and equanimity.
(Rahula, p. 49)
Other teachings speak of the Four Friends and the Five
Hindrances that one encounters along the path; these are qualities in the heart
which may aid or distract one from the process. The four friends are: loving kindness,
compassion, sympathetic joy and equanimity. Loving kindness is universal love
for all beings, without distinction. Compassion is the ability to empathize with
others -- to feel what they are feeling. Sympathetic joy is the quality that takes
delight in the happiness of others. Equanimity is a calm acceptance of all that
happens, based on the insight of the impermanence of all things; in the end, the
only thing that really matters is liberation, so the vicissitudes of life don't
really have much significance. (Khema, p. 36 - 51) The five hindrances are: sensual
desire; ill will; sloth and torpor; restlessness and worry, or distraction; and
skeptical doubt. Everyone has these hindrances in common, so it is important to
find ways of eliminating them; they are like toxins or weeds which prevent the
cultivation of those qualities essential for self-discipline and stand in the
way of our liberation.
The Buddha's teachings on ethics and living a
good life also extended to the realm of the social and political. He was ahead
of his time in many ways; considering all people as equal, he rejected the caste
system and openly encouraged women to become students and teachers. He taught
that governments had a responsibility to lead by example, to teach people ethics
and to eliminate poverty by providing opportunities for the people to become prosperous.
He was clearly opposed to all forms of war, and taught that violence can never
create security. In keeping with these teachings, Buddhism is rare among world
religions in that its followers never attempted to spread their beliefs through
the use of force. Unique among victorious leaders, the Buddhist emperor Asoka
in the third century BCE renounced violence and war, and put Buddhist ethical
virtues at the center of his government.
Regarding the Buddhist path
as a philosophy, one may consider its epistemology: certain claims of knowledge
have been made, but how can they be known to be true? As stated above, the Buddha
himself never asked anyone to accept unproven claims on faith, and in fact discouraged
them from doing so. He maintained that his teachings could be verified by direct
insight and reasoning, by anyone willing to consider them and to follow the necessary
path of self-discipline. Starting from a few basic assumptions, such as impermanence
and dependent origination, he derived a complex and consistent system of philosophy
which has stood for centuries. Later teachers have validated his claim that others
could reach the same insights, and they have expanded upon his basic teachings
with impressive intuitive depth and intellectual rigor.
In this way the
Buddhist teaching has itself become a kind of interactive and self-evolving process,
much like its idea of pratityasamutpada. However, the end goal is still Nirvana,
which is an experience ultimately beyond all concepts and language, even beyond
the Buddhist teachings. In the end even the attachment to the Dharma, the Buddhist
teaching, must be dropped like all other attachments. The tradition compares the
teaching to a raft upon which one crosses a swift river to get to the other side;
once one is on the far shore, there is no longer any need to carry the raft. The
far shore is Nirvana, and it is also said that when one arrives, one can see quite
clearly that there was never any river at all.
1. What the Buddha Taught, by Walpola Rahula; Grove Press, NY, 1959.
Being Nobody, Going Nowhere, by Ayya Khema; Wisdom Publications, Boston, 1987.
3. Great Thinkers of the Eastern World, ed. by Ian McGreal; Harper Collins,
Article: 'Buddha' by Narayan Champawat.
4. Essential Sacred
Writings from Around the World, ed. by Mircea Eliade; HarperCollins, NY, 1967.
5. The Encyclopedia of Eastern Philosophy and Religion, ed. by S. Shuhmacher
and G. Woerner, (Buddhist sections by Ingrid Fischer-Schreiber); Shambhala, Boston,
6. The Buddhist Tradition, ed. by William Theodore de Bary; Random
House, NY, 1972.