Swooping Down from Above
I'd like to read
something by the Third Karmapa, Rangjung Dorje, whose name means the self-existent
diamond. This Karmapa was a Dzogchen master. He was the Dharma brother of Longchenpa,
the enlightened fourteenth century Dzogchen patriarch. This is a very important
pith-instruction from the secret, oral pith-instruction lineage of the Mahamudra
and Dzogchen tradition. It's called The Single Word of Heart-Advice.
The
Single Word of Heart-Advice
Homage to all the sacred masters.
The heart-mind
of all the Buddhas of the past, the present, and the future, widely renowned as
Dharmakaya, as Mahamudra, as enlightened mind, is precisely your own mind, which
thinks of this and that.
What kind of Buddhist teaching is this? Even with
all the poisons and everything, today's mind is inseparable from Buddha Mind?
This is what the Karmapa says; and, as you all know, the Karmapa is the big boss,
so it must be true. (Just joking!) But let's find out for ourselves if it is true.
It's possible.
The Karmapa says that the essential nature of your own mind,
which thinks of this and that, is the Buddha Mind, is Dharmakaya, absolute truth,
Mahamudra, Dzogchen. All the phenomena of Samsara and Nirvana appear within this
unique awareness, your awareness. Samsara is not downtown somewhere, while Nirvana
is uptown, or on the other shore. Karmapa says all the phenomena of Samsara and
Nirvana fit within this unique awareness. This unique innate awareness is the
heart-essence of all the sutra teachings, the tantra teachings, and all the commentaries
and pith-instructions.
Yet, when you apply it in practice, there is nothing
whatsoever to be meditated upon. It is an empty, luminous, spacious, unobstructed
void.
Simply allow this unique awareness to rest vividly awake and present
in its natural way.
This is Karmapa's teaching. That's what you have to do.
There's nothing to meditate on. Just allow awareness to rest totally present and
awake. That's why it's called mirror-like awareness, sky-like awareness. Not doing
anything. Everything happens as if in that sky-like mirror of mind. The sky and
the mirror don't do anything of their own volition, but simply accommodate transitory
reflection, without essentially changing.
You don't need to worry or think,
"Is this really it? Could this be Mahamudra?" Don't bother yourself
with these doubts and questions. Don't hope for improvement or be afraid of degeneration.
How can we progress and develop spiritually if we don't hope for improvement?
What kind of Dharma path is this? Karmapa says don't hope for improvement and
don't fear going down. Don't chase such transient concepts, like improvement and
degeneration. Just rest nakedly at home in this vividly awake present awareness.
Relax loosely and rest. Beside this, you don't need anything to meditate on. So
let that be the object of your meditation, of non-meditation. The non-meditation
called sustaining present wakefulness.
By practicing in this extraordinarily
simple way, again and again, you will definitely recognize the groundless, rootless
open essence of all thoughts, appearances, and phenomena. When that happens, realization
blooms naturally. All attachments, all habitual patterns, all conditioning is
spontaneously liberated and released in this blossoming of realization.
This
is called Buddhahood. This is what is meant when it says, "One moment makes
all the difference. One moment of total awareness is one moment of perfect freedom
and enlightenment."
That's why this practice is so profound. One moment
is enough. One eternal instant. You don't have to build it up like an investment
program, until it ripens. One moment includes it all. One moment makes all the
difference. Why not this moment? What are we waiting for?
I swear there is
not a more profound and ultimate instruction from all the holy and realized masters
of the enlightened lineage that is more profound and more vital than this single
word of my heart-advice. Please don't waste this. Don't squander it. Remember
this teaching always. There is no mistake in it. Rely on the blessings of such
a teaching, rather than on the blessings of others.
This was written by Karmapa
Rangjung Dorje in the Yangon Hermitage. May all beings be happy. Sarva mangalam.
What, then, does this mean, that one moment makes all the difference? One
moment of perfect awareness-pristine, primordial being-is one moment of freedom
and enlightenment. Karmapa says that is called Buddhahood. Some people say you
can't become a Buddha if you're a woman. Some people say you can only become an
arhat. Some people say you can't become a Buddha without developing through the
ten bhumis (Bodhisattva levels) for three endless eons. Some people say all kinds
of things, but the practice lineage teachers say we are all Buddhas by nature.
We only have to awaken to that. And that happens in the present moment, through
total awareness, through a total moment of illuminated presence. We are far more
Buddha-like that we think.
So that's the result of this kind of practice.
But that's also the practice itself, isn't it? It's not different from what we
are doing. It is the practice we're doing. This trekchod practice of cutting through,
seeing through-perforating the solidity of ideas and things with this sharp, penetrating
awareness in the present moment-that's the practice we are doing here. That's
the path as well as the result. And not only that, it is also the basis, the ground
where we are coming from. This innate or present awareness is where we begin,
where we live, where we are coming from-not just where we are heading towards.
It is the ground, our fundamental nature; it's the path, the way we practice;
and it's the result, the freedom itself. That's why it is said that the ground,
path, and fruit are one and inseparable.
The Dalai Lama said something once,
which is often misunderstood. He said Dzogchen is the practice of Buddhas, not
of beings. Some people think that means we can't practice it. But what he was
saying is that it's the Buddha itself, the innate Buddha Mind called Rigpa, that
is practicing it. It's not that we "beings," like lead dolls, are polishing
ourselves until we polish it enough that we become like a diamond. He's not saying
that. He's saying it's the Buddhas practicing it. It is Rigpa practice, not conceptual
practice or mind-made meditation practice. That is why Trekchod is most often
taught and practiced in the context of a guru yoga sadhana, in which it is no
longer one's ordinary limited self that is practicing the meditation.
Rigpa
is the basis, our true nature; it is the path, our practice; and also the result,
Buddhahood, freedom, peace. That's why we say Dharmakaya or Rigpa, this innate
awareness, this inner wisdom, is Nirvana. Nirvana is not somewhere else. Rigpa
is Buddha. It is the ultimate refuge. It is the entire truth. It is the sublime
Dharma. And it is the noble Sangha. It is all of us, whether we know it or not.
Such exaltedness may seem far from us sometimes, but we are never apart from it.
I have a lot of faith in this practice. I've found, much to my surprise,
that it is all true. When my beloved teacher Kalu Rinpoche used to tell us this
twenty years ago, I couldn't believe it. My head was too thick. It seemed too
good to be true. He said your very mind, thinking of this and that, is not apart
from the Buddha-mind. It's not your mind, your problem. It's Buddha's problem;
give it back to Buddha. Buddha already "got enlightened for your sins."
You can relax. It's not your problem. It's Buddha-nature expressing itself as
a rainy day, as a storm, or as a sunny day. It is Buddha-nature expressing itself
as winter and also as summer. Also as fall, when we are dying, and as spring,
when we are being born. Everything is an expression of Buddha-nature or suchness,
tathagatagarbha.
There is nothing else happening. It's the beginning and
the end. The alpha and omega, as we say in our own Western wisdom tradition. We
are alpha and omega both. Nowhere to go and nothing missing. That's why Karmapa
says that this very heart-mind is it; don't overlook it! It is too close, so we
can't see it; we overlook it. It is innate, so we can't get it.
When my teacher
Kalu Rinpoche used to say this to me twenty or more years ago, it seemed too good
to be true. I couldn't believe it. It didn't make sense. Not possible! It must
be something else, I thought: Self-improvement, enlightenment or bust, get better,
transform, find something, understand something, learn something special, become
different. We all think like that, don't we? But what about the other side? What
about pure being, not our doings? Where we are coming from, not just where we
think we are going towards on this highly touted express train to enlightenment.
It seems too good to be true, but it is true. It is too close, so we can't see
it, we can't get it. It's too obvious and too evident, so we don't notice it.
It's too transparent.
Have any of you read Mount Analog by Rene Daumal? It
is a spiritual allegory about many seekers seeking something special, the crystal
mountain or the mystical jewels, the transparent diamonds of enlightenment. Actually
it's an unfinished story, because what is happening is that they are walking on
the transparent mountain. And every rock is the transparent jewel, but they can't
recognize it because it is transparent. And because it's not just one thing that
they have to find. It's everything. And it's the climbers too. So how to find
something that's not separate from you? Moreover, how to become what we are?
It's very subtle, so it's hard to recognize. But we might start to look in this
direction; towards the view, the ground of being: Towards where we are coming
from, not just where we think we are going towards. Towards the goal, not just
the present means or meditation technique. Then we can experience this incredibleness;
what we would call in English perfection or completeness, illumination, realization,
great peace, unconditional love and openness. Freedom. What was it that Kris Kristofferson
wrote? "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose." When
we have no more illusions about enlightenment and Nirvana and when we have no
more illusions about ourselves; when we're free of illusion, free of everything-Free!
Not just getting into the right concrete castle or blissful, peaceful meditation
state. Freedom is much bigger than that. Any state is temporary, is fabricated,
so we can fall from it. Any seat, throne, or pedestal we can fall off of. But
the ground we can't fall off of. It's like gravity. The Dharma is upholding us.
Even if we jump up, there's nowhere to go. We don't need to stand or tiptoe to
get higher. We just exhaust ourselves in that way.
We keep trying to tie
knots in the vast, open sky, so we have something to hold onto to. We keep trying
to jump up. We stand on tiptoes trying to get higher, keep reaching up, put a
ladder up, climb a tower; but we can never leave the groundless ground. Even if
we fly or are in orbit like an astronaut, it is the groundless ground of being
that we are all based in. This is what we are looking into here. And this is what
we are using and living and breathing every day, while hardly even knowing it
because it takes so many different forms. We are lost in the myriad forms.
I love the vital teaching in the Heart Sutra, saying "Form is emptiness,
and emptiness is form." Not just that all forms are empty, but also that
emptiness takes form. Recognize the shapes of emptiness also, so we know what
we are doing here. You should see through the window, but don't forget the window
is there. Otherwise, you just break it, or crash into it like a bird. Did you
ever see a bird flying into a window because it didn't see it? That's just seeing
the emptiness of things, but not recognizing the forms, the karma, the interconnectedness,
the interdependent origination. How things actually function and work. As we say
in the Mahayana teachings, "See how things appear to be, as well as how they
actually are." If you are having a dream or a nightmare, you could know that.
You don't just say, "No, there's no dream." It's a dream. It's a nightmare
or a good dream, but it's just a dream. Recognize the appearances as well as their
nature. And ourselves, our own appearance, how we are and what we seem to need
and how we work. This is variously called the two levels or aspects of truth:
absolute and relative, or ultimate and conventional, essence and function.
Not just saying, "Oh, we're all just one. It doesn't matter. Nothing matters."
When you start to hear "nothing matters," the red flag should go up.
The bullshit detector should flash and beep! Be alerted to whatever self-justification
or rationalization is there. "I don't mind. You don't matter. No mind, no
matter." That's bullshit. It's rationalization. It's nihilism. It is a symptom
of too much emptiness. Sage Nagarjuna said, "It's a pity that some people
believe in concrete reality, but much more pitiful are those who believe in emptiness."
It's easier to get stuck in emptiness. There's no way to get out; no steps. No
exit, as Sartre said. No enlightenment. No hand holds, no helping hands. No anything.
That's fine when you've experienced it; but until then, it's too soon to say that
it doesn't matter, that everything is empty, like a dream.
Let's try to be
very conscientious about our spiritual work. As we say in the Dzogchen tradition:
Swoop down from above, with the vast view of everything perfect, as it is-absolute
truth, emptiness-while at the same time, climbing up from below according to our
capacity, through relative practices, relative truth. Swooping down while climbing
up from below. Let's broaden our minds a bit, so we're not stuck with just one
perspective. Can we hold both at the same time? Can we see the forest while we
are down on all fours in the trees, counting wild mushrooms? It is very important
to be sensible and balanced in our spiritual work so we don't just space out,
swooping down from above and having a crash landing. Skiing straight down the
mountain is a good example of too much hubris. You can get out of control and
crash right into the parking lot at the bottom or go through a guard rail and
over a cliff. On the other hand, we don't want to be totally bogged down with
schlepping up from below with all our heavy baggage, being so serious and grim
about how far it seems to be to enlightenment and missing all the joy of the journey.
We need both the absolute picture-swooping down, with the effortless joy and the
freedom of freefall flight-and the relative picture-carefully, meticulously taking
care of all the details, climbing up from below according to our capacity through
relative practices, including virtuous living, honesty, ethics, purification,
and all the transcendental paramitas. Each of those Bodhisattva virtues is a practice:
perfection of patience, perfection of generosity, perfection of effort, perfection
of forgiveness, perfection of meditation, and so on. All those are practices to
do. It doesn't just come because we read about it or believe in it. Buddhadharma
is a do-it-yourself path. We have to actually walk the talk, not just verbalize
it.
I find in my own life that although I'm always thinking about the highest
truth, and inspired when I read about these things-and I hope you read them too,
writings by poets like Longchenpa, Patrul Rinpoche, Shabkar, Rumi, Kabir, and
Milarepa-yet when you really bring it down to your life, it must filter down to
a very practical level, to how we actually live. Do we always take the best seat?
Do we cut corners? Do we steal little things? Do we lie? (Just little white ones,
right?) Maybe we keep the moral precepts. We don't hear much about the precepts
here, because that's not really the emphasis of Dzogchen, but of course we understand
that the training in virtue, restraint, nonharming, and morality is very helpful.
"Of course, I don't kill." Maybe I forget that my speeding car kills
a lot of moths and other insects; but, we might assert, at least I don't intentionally
kill. I don't fish. I don't hunt. But maybe I eat meat, wear leather clothes,
have ivory on my mala beads, millions of silkworms in my silk kimono. And maybe
you do too. The precept is not just not to kill; it is about cherishing life.
We ought to really look into what it means to respect and cherish life in all
its forms.
Another important precept is not to steal. Well, maybe I don't
steal formally; but maybe I invest in companies that steal, in companies that
steal from other countries or that steal or destroy the environment. It's not
just we shouldn't steal. It's that we shouldn't exploit. We don't need to take
more than our share. You can apply this to any of the precepts. Maybe I don't
lie (that's probably a lie, but maybe not); but what about slander, gossip, harsh
words, and the little white lies we tell ourselves everyday along with our internal
story line? You get mad sometimes at somebody, and you say harsh things, don't
you? They count too. That's the principle of the precepts. The little lies, the
deceptions, count karmically too. Self-deception also counts. How straightforward,
forthright, and honest are we, really? You can say the same with the precepts
regarding intoxication, sexual misconduct, and pride. It says in the Buddhist
sutras things like "Don't sleep on a high bed." And you say, "I
don't sleep on a high bed. I sleep on the floor-on my imported Japanese futon
with silk sheets and duck featherfilled pillows." But who cares about inches
and feet high and low? That's an old-fashioned manner of expression. The precept
is about pride, about taking the higher place, about being above others. And it's
about simplicity and contentment, rather than excess.
How much excess do
we have? How many tape recorders, cameras, TVs, phone numbers, credit cards, and
computers do you have? Maybe you have one of each, but I know a lot of us have
more than one of each. We have last year's and this year's, and are looking for
next year's. I personally have a Walkman, a dictaphone, and my partner has a stereo
and also a Walkman and a CD player and two TVs. That's a lot between just the
two of us and a dog. Excess. I read that 20 million children are dying every year
in the Third World of diarrhea and malnutrition. And the Western countries are
collecting the best from those countries, exploiting them, deforesting them. Of
course, it's not just the Western countries. Now China is deforesting Tibet. The
powerful often exploit the weak. I try to see if I am doing that. And if so, how?
If we realize these profound mystical truths, that we are all Buddha, that everything
is sacred, wouldn't we treat everybody like we treat our own bodies, like we treat
ourselves and our most beloved family members, as a responsible, affectionate,
caring guardian rather than as an exploiter?
If these teachings don't filter
down from the highest level right into most aspects of our lives, into our relations,
where it really counts-what use are they? So let's examine and see how it affects
our life. Does our spiritual practice actually affect our life? Do our beliefs
change our life? Does the Buddhadharma actually work for us? Because if it doesn't,
who needs it?!
One of my friends who is a Buddhist teacher, Ken McLeod, who
is a senior American lama in our Kagyu tradition, said, "It doesn't matter
what you believe. It only matters what you do." I thought that was very profound
for somebody who has been a full-time Buddhist "believer" for 25 or
30 years. I then asked whether it helps to believe that the practice you are doing
will help you, and what's the use of doing certain Buddhist practices if you don't
believe in them? Or of praying if you don't believe in it? He said that if you
pray, it means you believe in it, whatever you may think you believe in.
So if you come here and meditate, you are already doing something. It is the actualization
of a deeper belief, deeper than our conscious mind. I have a lot of faith in Ken,
so it must be true! (Just joking!) Does it matter what we believe, or does it
matter more what we do, how we live? That's why Gandhi said, when asked by a reporter
what was the heart of his teaching, "My life is my teaching. How I live is
my teaching." He tried to walk his talk, to practice what he preached. So
look at how you live, and you'll know what your teaching is. (Your children are
getting that teaching daily, by the way, so pay attention.) And it's not just
your teaching, but it's also indicative of your realization. So look there; don't
look at the gilded Buddha statue on the altar here. Look in the mirror. Have a
good look every day. Reflect on what you perceive there. But please don't get
too depressed!
There's nothing to get too depressed about actually, but there's
also nothing to get too excited or elated about. Getting enlightened is just one
more experience. The world will just keep turning.
I've been thinking about
this a lot lately in meetings with other teachers. We've explored this with the
Dalai Lama also: What is it that is most truly transformative? Eating oranges
is supposed to be good for a cold, but what is in it really that is good for the
cold? The vitamin C, maybe. So what is it in the various spiritual activities
and practices and studies that we do that is most truly transformative? Some people
say mindfulness. Some people say devotion, love, compassion. Some people say investigation,
inquiry. Some people say meditation. There are many ideas. So what is it? Let's
look at our own life. What is it? If we can refine that question, it's like a
life koan. Let's try to delve more and more deeply into that question-what is
truly transformative-and let go more and more of what is extra, so we can gradually
learn to go more directly towards it. (By the way, the Dalai Lama answered, "analysis
and meditation.") I personally have been thinking that what was most transformative
for me was the longing, the aspiration, the passion for enlightenment. Keeping
at it over a long time, in all parts of life. Not just in religious settings,
but all the time, wherever life led me. This is probably part of bodhicitta, which
means aspiration for awakening. I think each of us have our own piece of that
active within our hearts and minds, whether we know it or not.
Any questions
tonight? Please feel free. Anything left from this week? We've been here about
seven or eight days together.
Do you still practice, meditate, pray, and
study after becoming enlightened?
The Dalai Lama gets up at 4 every morning
and meditates and studies and does his practices. But that can be said to be an
expression of enlightenment itself. But I shouldn't use the word "enlightenment."
It has too many imprecise interpretations. Dogen Zenji said, "Meditation
is enlightenment." Not that you meditate to get enlightened, but rather that
zazen or meditation is Buddha, freedom. That's the other side of the seeker's
notion of spiritual climbing. Like in the tale of Mount Analog. You're climbing
the mountain, but don't forget it's the mountain from the beginning to the end,
not just the top. And all the rocks are the transparent diamonds of enlightenment.
These are just poetic images. But if you can do practice from that place, rather
than from an impoverished mentality of incompleteness; it's much more vast. For
example, we could let Buddha do your sitting tonight. Let Tara do your chanting
of the Tara mantra. Let Avalokiteshvara do your chanting of the compassion mantra.
If you don't conceive that it's me and mine, and my distractions and my bad voice,
and my weariness, then it all takes on a very different character. It's not just
meditation in action. It's freedom in action. It's the view in action. Then every
practice we do, even ringing the bell at the Hanuman Temple or bowing to idols,
takes on a completely different meaning. You can light a candle to the Buddha
and put some incense in front of the statue there, but you don't have to forget
what your deepest practice is. You know it's not for that statue; Buddha statues
don't need to be warmed or illumined by candles. But external observances can
help us to be more thoroughly observant, inside and out.
Spiritual practice
is a way of life. It's not just a means to an end. It's like living sanely or
healthy. It's not to get some other goal. It is to be fully present here and now,
not just to be high now and roll-your-own-dharma. It is to be totally one with
all and everything, totally present here and now.
What does emaho mean?
Emaho is kind of a Dzogchen exclamation. It means wonderful, far out, amazing,
yes! Emaho!
What is the meaning of the mantras we do?
We don't really
chant mantras for their meaning, but the Sanskrit words do have a meaning.
The first chant on the practice sheet is simply "Ah." Ah is hard to
translate. It's like Om, but it's ah. We'll just leave it like that. It's like
the Buddha is the doctor. He gives you the medicine that heals you of all disease,
all unease, all suffering. Just think that he is saying, "Ah!" and checking
to see if anything is wrong, like when you open your mouth and say ah to a general
physician who checks you.
Next is the mantra of Great Compassion of Avalokiteshvara:
"Om Mani Padmé Hung." Om is the universal sound. Mani means jewel.
Padmé, pema, means lotus. So it means the jewel is in the lotus. Then there's
Hung, but that's not there for the meaning; it's there for the completeness of
the vibrational tone. Hung is the consort of Om. It is the seed syllable of the
five wisdoms. But the meaning is that the jewel is in the lotus, or wisdom and
compassion are within us all, like pure seeds blossoming and unfolding within
our own tender hearts.
The next one, "Om Ah Hung Benzar Guru Padmé
Siddhi Hung," is the Vajra Guru mantra of Padma Sambhava, the Lotus-born
Guru who brought Buddhism to Tibet in the eighth century. He is called the Second
Buddha, the Buddha of Tibet. First Om Ah Hung; then it says Benzar, or Vajra,
Guru Padmé. It's like saying homage to the diamond master, born in the
lotus. Padmé is lotus. Siddhis mean spiritual powers, like love, wisdom,
compassion, forgiveness, enlightenment. So the meaning is homage to the enlightened
powers of the Lotus-born Guru. It's a way of affirming that the lotus grows and
flourishes out of the mud of one's own nature. Those enlightened powers grow in
the mud of our own base nature. Human nature is like the tip of the vast iceberg
of Buddha-nature.
The last one is "Om Taré Tutarré Turiyé
Soha." That's the mantra of the female Buddha, Tara. Again, we start with
the cosmic sound, Om. Taré is her name. It's an invocation that Tara is
present and guarding and awakening us. Tutarré is her name again. So is
Turiyé. Soha or swaha is like amen, or so be it. So it's her name mantra.
Chanting it attracts her (our) attention, exhorts her swiftly enlightening activity,
and brings down and brings out her bountiful blessings.
As I said, we don't
really chant these mantras thinking of their meaning. When we chant it, we can
feel the vibration on an energy level. Something happens, much more than just
thinking or saying that the mantra means the jewel in the lotus. You can begin
with the meaning, but then you go quickly deeper into it and experience it from
the inside out by chanting and meditating on it. It works in your chakras and
in your psychic energy channels, and so on, vibrating in different sacred dimensions.
There are different kinds of mantras: softening mantras; energetic, generating
mantras; peaceful and wrathful mantras; healing mantras; purification mantras;
and so on.
These mantras are made up of seed syllables. Each of these syllables
is called a seed, a bija in Sanskrit. Om is such a seed syllable. A mantra is
a string of them, like a rosary. The string linking the beads is the breath and
the attention. Each seed syllable germinates in a slightly different way. Just
look at the different seed syllables. Like P'et! That's very sharp and cutting,
so we call that a cutting syllable. Then there's Ah! A very softening, opening,
spacious, relaxing, dissolving seed syllable. So we try to harmoniously balance
different aspects. We balance the sharpness, the one-pointedness of the P'et with
the spacious, expansive softness of the Ah. You can feel the different quality
of the sounds. Mantric sounds have a lot of vibrations, and different levels that
they vibrate on. These mantras are kind of a technology for awakening different
energies and actualizing different qualities. It's not really like asking an external
deity named Tara to do something. It's more like actualizing within ourselves
that sacred feminine energy which Tara embodies.
With a mantra like Om Mani
Padmé Hung, some lamas make a vow to do huge numbers of recitation practice,
like 100 million times, which they count with their beads. They are always saying
it. They try to say 20 or 30 or 50,000 mantras every day. They are always concentrating
on compassion and loving-kindness, radiating and warming up and softening, seeing
everybody as the Buddha and every place as a Buddhafield. They radiate blessings
and light rays to all the different kinds of beings with Om Mani Padmé
Hung. Kalu Rinpoche, for example: We took him once to the aquarium in Boston in
the winter of 1976. There were some huge glass walls thick with little fish there.
There were thousands of fish in huge tanks. Rinpoche would go up to the glass
and, holding his bodhi-seed mala beads in hand, say Om Mani Padmé Hum again
and again. He went up to each fish and individually, touched a finger gently to
the window near its little face to get its attention, to make a connection, and
said Om Mani Padmé Hung. We couldn't even walk around the aquarium, because
he was busy, blessing and teaching the fish. He seemed to connect personally with
each one. Nor was he the least bit self-conscious about it. It was marvelous.
If you do this kind of loving practice, it comes out naturally in many ways.
Rinpoche used to say Om Mani Padmé Hung over bowls of rice or sand every
morning. Then he'd throw them out the window or spread it as he walked, so all
the ants and dogs and snakes would eat the rice grains or touch the sand and make
a spiritual connection, be blessed and benefited. He did that every day of his
life. He even suggested to us, his students, that we had to do that. I admit to
not living up to his standard.
Mantras have power. Mudras, hand gestures,
have power. Yantra, or visualizations, mandalas, have power. Of course, it is
the power of the mind that invests in them such resonance. Buddha said, "Mind
comes first. Before deed and words comes thought or intention. So guard carefully
your own mind."
October 8, 1994 