Page 4: Emptiness Nature
Buddhist philosophy talks about illusory nature, or emptiness; and again and
again, its texts go into deeper understanding of "emptiness nature."
But emptiness nature doesnt need to be understood in a complicated way.
It simply says that everything we hold to be true, real, or solid is, in fact,
composite and doesnt have any independent existence on its own.
We can look at outer objects or we can look at ourselvesat that strongest
of attachments, [our] sense of "I." The ego, or I, is always there.
Most of you are familiar with how analytical meditation pinpoints that certain
thing called "I." We find that wherever we lookoutside or inside,
in any part of our body or organsno matter where we search, in reality
we cannot find anything that is independent, [nothing] that can be called an
independent "self," or "I."
So we walk around with a false notion that "I" in some way exists.
Logically, we gather together the compositeness of body, as well as mind and
consciousness, karma, and habitual patterns, and we assume theres an "I."
And yet [when we] really examine it, "I" and our strong grasping to
its self existence is no different than the notion of the existence of my horns.
So we can see that "emptiness nature" is simply talking about that
nature which is "empty," and yet with its composite quality, has the
[potential for] action, for some kind of activity.
All the texts talk about resting the mind in the absolute true nature, the true
nature of emptiness. And within the Buddhist tradition, we find 84,000 tenet
teachings [on emptiness]. Then over the last 2,600 years of Buddhism, we find
more explanations and texts expounding different details of these 84,000 tenets.
So hundreds of thousands of teachings are available on emptiness. I think nowhere
in the history of any civilization is there a more complicated method to explain
what emptiness is! (Laughter.) [It is] a clear example of how our mind really
wants something to be there (laughter).
We find every teacher trying to explain what emptiness is and talking about
the same things over and over: no shape, no color, no form, no feeling, no touchno
nothing (laughter). I sometimes feel tremendously touched and grateful to all
of these teachers: in no other way could anyone explain more kindly what emptiness
is. When a teacher sits and sees no form, no feeling, no touch, no sensation,
no color, no shapetheres really no other way to support that in
speech than to try and explain about not making it complicated, keeping it simple.
When complexity is added, illusion grows, [and] things become more trapped in
action and reaction, in cause and fruition. Illusionwhatever we may call
itsimply grows out of making [emptiness] complex, making it difficult.
Spiritual practice, such as buddhist meditation, should lead towards cutting
through complexity and resting the mind in an understanding of absolute truth.
Then something can be understood. And todays meditatorsespecially
in the West where so much practice is going onneed to understand that.
When [absolute truth] is understood, then you will really be practicing sincerely.
If you can remain with that understanding, the spiritual path has some meaningwithout
any pretense of being a meditator, or of being on any particular path of practice.
From the moment you sit in meditation, you realize that what youre trying
to achieve is simply the first basic responsibility of being a human being,
being honest to yourself and honest towards others.
From that honesty, youre able to understand complete genuineness in every
action. If you have a body, you fulfill the responsibilities of having a human
body, and [you] do not harm anyone else. If you achieve some happiness for yourself,
in the midst of your own happiness, you generate as much or greater happiness
as you can for others. If you have speech, youre responsible for your
speech and you dont hurt or inflict harm on anyone else through speech.
And you take care of your own mind, generating thoughts that are useful. Simple
common sense tells us that if a thought is useless, meaningless, or harmful,
and not at all good for anyone else, you shouldnt generate that [thought].
So, youre able to really train your body, speech, and mindand you
are able to see what is left.
If you do not harm anyone with your body, speech, or mind, what else remains?
That remaining nature is a spiritual meditator. You may not be very busy doing
very intricate, complicated things, but even if you were doing the most complex
studies of Buddhism, you should end up that way. And, if a beginning meditator
can begin that way and that is the end [result], if you choose to go through
all the 84,000 tenets for millions of years to reach that same point, its
very much your own choice! (Laughter.) The more you practice in this way, the
more you understand Buddhism. I think it is necessary to do that.
I recall times when we would go to our teachers, [wanting] to receive the most
complicated teachings, the most challenging instructions, and heart essence
teachings. These were always very tempting. But when teachers would talk on
the Four Reminders, most of the time we wouldnt attend. We knew them already:
we knew human life was very precious, we knew impermanence was there (laughter),
we knew about cause and effect and the suffering of sentient beings. So we would
wait for the most challenging topics to come up. But if we think about it, all
of those challenging, complicated philosophies, views, meditations, and different
paths of practices are meant to [make us] really tired of doing them, really
tired of trying to see. (Laughter.) So [while] theres real benefit from
them, in some sense theyre ways to tame the really untamed ones.
The way to [practice] is to truly come back and understand that within the First
Noble Truththe truth of sufferingis the entirety of all the teachings
of all three yanas. One who doesnt understand and appreciate this human
life, who never realizes its potential for so much goodness, who is unable to
fulfill all of its responsibilities, and doesnt understand the value of
human lifesuch a person cannot truly generate any compassion for [other]
sentient beings.
Venerable Khandro Rinpoche
New York public Talk 10-20-98
Page 6: Question period
On Working with Form/Emptiness
On Letting Go
On Personal Investigation
Guidelines for Basic Meditation
On Mutual Appreciation
On Positive and Negative Karma
On Working with Form/Emptiness
Q (inaudible...) Is it possible to be a good buddhist by cleaning your room?
(Laughter.) I ask that in all seriousness. Im trying to help somebody
learn how to clean their room; and if its all an illusion, if it doesnt
really matter, would you say... ?
A No, no, no, no. I think to be a good buddhist, you have to know how to clean
your room. (Laughter)
Q. So I can tell my friend that... (inaudible).
A. I think so. [Then] the mind can rest in the absolute, true nature of emptiness,
in the absolute true quality innately within each sentient being. [We] get stuck
in relative existence for such a long time, believing in it for so many lifetimesand
for those who only see as far as one lifetime, even in this one lifetime were
so very stuck in our own fixations, on what seems so real. Although the innate
quality of emptiness is there, we havent realized it, so were still
stuck with form. And as long as were stuck with form, talking about emptiness
does not at all mean that weve realized it. Until then, our responsibilityeven
to clean up clutteris necessary.
Q. So, sometimes in order to shatter illusion, you have to do some work.
A. Look at this shrine room, look at the forms we have, look at where I am sitting.
(Laughter.) As long as this is real then, yes, we have to clean the shrine room,
and make sure that theres always someone sitting on these brocadesalthough
it looks a little bit odd in some cases.
Q, Is it real to you?
A. It shouldnt be; thats my practice.
Q. It shouldnt be?
A. It shouldnt be; but as long as its necessary, then its
necessary.
Q. (inaudible) When we talk about dealing with depression, we [may] realize
that everything around us is an illusion, that its all complete nonsense,
it doesnt exist, its all mind. But what if you have a certain type
of karma that you have to deal with every day, like a disability? And youre
told not to be depressed about it, not to get really sad or anything, and you
realize that you actually create it yourself. But you still get depressed. What
do you do in that situation?
A. Its a good question, in the sense that thats why form becomes
necessary, as I said in relation to the first question. But we cannot say "this
form is good," or "that form is not good." Often we try to cut
through one fixed, or rigid, form, thinking "[thats] not the right
thing to do" or "I should be more flexible," [and we] develop
another path. But over the ages that path, again, becomes one more form. So
many forms arise out of trying to cut through existing forms.
In the same way, Buddhism has been formulated as a philosophy and path of practice:
different yanas, different levels, different dos and donts, and
levels of practice, things that some can see and some cannot, some can do and
some cannot. And then there has to be someone sitting to judge whether this
person is qualified to do this or not qualified to do that. In the beginning,
none of those rigid forms arose as a necessity at all. They were never talked
about.
Through time, human beings handle even something as profound as buddhist philosophy
[this way]. We begin to use our own interpretations and our own minds to give
rise to certain ideas, thinking theyre really beneficial. We say, "truly,
because it worked for me, it will work for you." And sometimes it does,
but sometimes we just get stuck with another system. In trying to overcome one
system, or form, we create another.
Students of a particular teacher become teachers themselves and, for them, their
teacher is the most excellent teacher. They assume that what worked for them
should work for everyone. And its a good thought; but out of it, again,
come two [warring] factions, saying, "my lineage is better than your lineage,"
"my school is better than your school." And again we have form.
Looking at it in terms of meditation, illusion needs to be understood to lessen
our grasping and attachment; but on the other hand, [we must] always appreciate
relative existence.
When talking about emptiness, always remember that suffering is part of it.
The Buddhist teachings do not begin with "everything is emptiness";
they begin with "everything is by nature suffering." [They] acknowledge
relativity, first, and then emptiness nature as the core essence of relative
experience. The life of a human being need not be stuck in relativity; and that
relativity need not be so bad or concrete. When we realize its core essence
of emptiness, we balance relativity and emptiness, rather than rejecting one
[or the other]. If we reject the relative and remain stuck in emptiness, we
can never be ordinary, compassionate human beings; if we forget emptiness and
remain stuck in relativity, then we end up as selfish human beings.
On Letting Go
Q. (inaudible: re feeling an emotion and letting it go).... If something very
painful happened to somebody early on, and they experience a numbness growing
up regarding that type of experience, do they not have to feel what happened
in order to release it?
A. I think a person is very lucky [to have] only experienced one kind of difficult
experience in life. (Laughter.) To relive [it] so that one can recognize how
painful it was and then get over it, sounds quite logical and practical. But
life [continues to be] full of difficultieseven though we think weve
only experienced one major suffering. And I dont think its necessary
to relive or re-experience it, or to try and go back into it again. In a few
exceptional cases, people are not able to deal with a major crisis. Theyre
in some kind of denial, not able to even acknowledge it, and bottling up their
emotions. On the other hand, some people work hard at generating a problemwhich
is unnecessary.
Every individuals difficulties and problems are different. It would be
very unfair to generalize emotional distress or difficult experiences. People
experience difficulties that you cant even dream of, and you must appreciate
what happens to people. On the other hand, its best, as much as possible,
not to make it harder on yourself by making it more real, or letting it overcome
[you] again and again and again. This is really not necessary.
Within the levels of meditative teachings and instructions, we first spend a
fair amount of time recognizing and examining what anger is (or desire, or ignorance,
or hatred, or jealousy). On the hinayana path, we simply look at it as something
entirely negative, destructiveand abandon it completely. From a mahayana
perspective, we talk about transforming it into something beneficial by applying
an antidote: whenever anger comes up, we immediately try to counteract that
angry emotion by generating tolerance or peacefulness; or if some kind of desire
or attachment comes up, we develop generosity or apply another antidote. [Then]
vajrayana Buddhism talks about transcending, [transforming] it into its pure
essence by recognizing its true nature. As soon as anger comes up, were
able to say "what is the nature of anger?" Then we dissolve itnot
as an illusion but rather by seeing that, other than our own grasping mind,
there is no anger by its own self. Nothing says "I am Mr. Anger, I will
go into her mouth or mind and generate anger." (Laughter.) Theres
no such thing. So transcending talks about it in that way.
If we see the three [levels] together, however, theyre all talking about
the same thing. Because people have different potential, different causes and
conditions, different aptitudes and likes, [they] feel attracted to the paths
that seems most skillful [to them]. For some, transcending works very well;
for some, transformation works very well; and for some, abandoning works very
well. Ultimately its the anger that has to go, isnt it? (Laughter.)
So, you can sit and visualize your teacher in front [of you] radiating light
into your heart center and dispelling all anger. Thats one effective method.
But, ultimately, you learn theres neither teacher, nor you, nor your angertherefore
it was an unnecessary thing to do. (Laughter.) From a hinayana point of view,
when anger comes up, you might simply abandon it, drop it. Thats it! Its
a way of seeing that all the unfortunate emotions or difficulties we experience
in our lives will remain as long as we make them [do so]. This does not in any
way mean that we dont appreciate the difficulties that people experience.
But the wise person is one whos able to let go and not drag it on too
long, because its not beneficial to oneself or anyone else. So making
this story very long is also your own choice (laughter), and being able to end
it is also up to you. The logical way of looking at it is the more beneficial
way of doing it.
On Personal Investigation
Q. (inaudible)
A. With all of our different explanations and our common senseeven in
terms of absolute truthwe try to achieve understanding based on somebody
elses hard work. [Even] sitting in meditation, were very much working
with the hard work of somebody elses experience. Reading these two texts,
we understand and say "this is true, this really strikes my heart"but
thats actually somebody elses experience, somebody elses logic.
Even [your] sitting here, trying to understand or agree with me that a pot is
empty by nature, is based on my own experience.
When we try to gain conviction based on somebody elses hard work, it doesnt
work very well. Because our conviction is not based on our own examination,
its very weak. So [as soon as] something more solid comes up, our weak
conviction is actually subdued by whatever is more apparent. When relativity
is more apparent, [when] anger is more apparent, you forget what Khandro Rinpoche
said about thoughts being empty by nature.
Nothing is more effective than spending time in personal investigation and examination,
taking the time to truly examine things such as impermanence or suffering. You
can spend considerable time saying "that strikes me as being true,"
but when you examine it [yourself], youre completely convinced. In Buddhism,
we talk about the importance of devotion, but faith and devotion are not merely
agreeing with what somebody else says. The Buddha taught, in the first place,
that [everything] has to be based on your personal investigation. Its
very much like the analogy of tasting honey: [when you taste] honey, you know
its sweet. If somebody comes along and says, "Im going to kill
you if you do not say honey is salty," you may say that its saltybut
deep down, you cant do much about the mind that says it is sweet anyway.
(Laughter.)
Similarly, [when you] spend time in personal investigative meditation, analyzing
and examining whether something is true or not, then you experience [it] for
yourself. Looking at something from all ten directions, you see that its
truly baseless and, therefore, useless to hold onto. Whether you call it "devotion,"
"faith," or whatever, its very much the same thing. The strength
of that allows us to cut through whatever habitual tendencies need to be cut
through.